Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Groups
  • Users
  • Tags
  • Popular
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (Zephyr)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

A-C-A (The Anti Cringe Association)(LETS PASS THE NINTENDO SWITCH GROUP LOL)

we stand against cringe on browsedns

Private

Posts


  • A rant about microlabels
    Gamizavierundefined Gamizavier

    There’s a lot to keep track of.

    Edge Of The Forum

  • A rant about microlabels
    Ariesundefined Aries

    @BBQboi-_

    I don't have much to add since Swaggy's already said most of it, BUT. I think that you're saying all of this while identifying as a micro label yourself. You can argue it's not all you'd like, but technically you like both genders just like bisexuality the only add on is everyone. I think that by you posting this it'll only make more people be afraid to say who they actually are, especially when those from their own community don't support them either. I've known I liked girls since 10, and over the years i've struggled to label that because I did still like boys but it was mainly girls so I felt like the bisexual or the lesbian label didn't fit me. Then I discovered the term 'homoflexible' which does fit me, it shows me that i'm not alone in feeling like this even though i've hardly heard that label be talked about. Uh- yeah rant over. Also, Happy pride :3

    Edge Of The Forum

  • A rant about microlabels
    w1ckedsticky1983undefined w1ckedsticky1983

    @BBQboi-_ this genuinely comes off as ignorant, homophobic, uninformed, and incites hateful ideology whether or not that was your initial intent. Everything here can most likely be refuted by simply stating: 'just because you don't particularly connect with a label, doesnt mean that nobody else in the world does.' (stay with me here) also, I do hope that you do actually read my response and keep an open mind because I'm not writing this to come off as morally superior and condescending, I'm just blatantly telling you that this is flat-out wrong.

    You claim that micro-labels don't bring connection and pushes people away further, but the main reason why people in the queer community made these labels is because they don't connect with the standard "gay" term. In a community filled with people who are already dysphoric and feel disconnected to general society, you claiming that these labels have zero meaning just pushes the narrative itself that that queer people themselves arent worthy and should feel invalidated.

    God forbid that people who have already been shamed, othered, and hated can finally find labels that make them feel validated and bring them solace.

    Not only that, but you saying that these labels don't have any meaning and that you are embarrassed of your own community only makes it immensely easy and simple for homophobic people to continue to perpetuate their bigoted beliefs. The main reason why you believe that this would harm the community further is because it makes us seem like as a "joke", but people who would even consider to view the queer community as a "joke" already have a negative viewpoint of it in mind. There being extra labels won't affect what they already believe because majority of the time, homophobic pigs are opposed to any open-minded beliefs to begin with. I'd say its most likely just people being stubborn, but you can't really help if the person is willingly being ignorant and hateful and stopping people from finding euphoria certainly won't affect this either.

    If homophobic people see that queers themselves have a distaste towards their own community, then it just gives them reasons to even be more hateful because: "why shouldnt I hate these people if 'insert slur''s themselves don't like them?" It's counterintuitive if anything. It makes you come off as "oh,,, I'm not one of THOSE gay people...!! I'm one of the GOOD ones!" Which, plainly just divides the community as a whole and perpetuates the belief that homophobic people have the right to feel the way they do just because you don't believe that the labels have any meaning.

    I think you just generally forgot where the word 'queer,' as used in the lgbtq came from, which it's plainly obvious to find out where the initial word and meaning was derived from. It literally comes from the word "queer," which means to be 'different,' 'out of the norm,' and, well, weird. Which, is what queer people were seen as throughout history. Hence why they use the term.

    The same logic can be applied as to why labels such as arosexual, asexual, and other labels similarly to those are indeed validated and should be considered part of the queer community just as any other gay person should be. Especially since being asexual means to have little to no attraction to anyone, regardless of sex and/or gender. Usually, having no sexual attraction to anyone is regarded as being "weird," hence why it fits into the "queer" term. I dunno, just wanted to bring this up since you did.

    Furthermore, id also like to add the meaning of what being Demisexual is because, while you're not entirely wrong, but there's so much more to it than just 'wanting to get to know the person better.'
    Demisexuals fall under the Ace/asexuality umbrella term. Demisexuality is a term used to describe individuals who rarely, or never, experience sexual attraction solely based on immediately observable characteristics. These can include physical appearance, smell, etc... Demi's can only experience attraction after developing a deep bond with someone. Which, strays from the general norm of basic lesbian or gay attraction that relies on the sexual attraction of gender and genatalia. It's obvious that you'd feel attracted to someone if you enjoy their company, beliefs, and them as a whole, but loving someone for their mind and body is different.

    I'd rather have a shitton of labels and terms for specific sexualities because at the end of the day, it harms no one and only brings comfort to the individuals who already have felt horrible for expressing who they truly are. This isn't even me trying to be "progressive," I'm just blatantly stating that just because you, yourself don't feel connected towards these terms and labels doesn't mean that anyone else doesn't. There's a reason why these labels exist in the first place and why they're actively being used today by thousands of LGBTQ people.

    After all, having micro-labels don't take away from the meaning of the umbrella terms such as gay, bisexuality, and even pansexuality. It's called a micro-label for a reason, so whenever someone says: "I hate that it's lgbtqwiznskwka instead of the standard lgbtq!!1!" It just comes off as hateful and uninformed to me.

    Obviously, I believe that people are more than their sexual identities and shouldn't be so hyper focused on these labels, but that's how everyone thinks. Especially since throughout history we've only ever been taught to see ourselves through the sex we're born as.

    Although, I won't deny that modern-day queer culture feeds off of stereotypes and makes everything aestheticized. Id actually love to have a conversation regarding this topic, but that's a whole other discussion.

    Anyways, these are just my thoughts. Once again, I don't intend to come off as rude, condescending, or morally superior, so please don't respond back being rude either. I don't want you to get in trouble over a discussion as simple as this, especially since you just became unbanned.

    Edge Of The Forum

  • roles of Westhelm
    Echo_isnt_hereundefined Echo_isnt_here

    @StarryPeach in hell >:]

    Edge Of The Forum daybreak newz

  • motivation (for those who need it)
    xenthundefined xenth

    when you seem down, look up. ive come to find in life, things always go so wrong, but in the end, you still have you. you will remain no matter what, stay strong people.

    Edge Of The Forum

  • Introduce yourself to Lena
    Naredundefined Nared

    I know this is kind of late. But greetings lena!

    Edge Of The Forum

  • Cool Userz!!!
    Echo_isnt_hereundefined Echo_isnt_here

    @Yoylecake u r :3

    Edge Of The Forum mazer

  • Marriage news.
    ShadowGamerXundefined ShadowGamerX

    @Jacqueline fr ik Raven said users with 100 reputation or more can downvote but now it isn't 100 reputation cause I have 137 reputation and I can downvote or upvote

    edit: turns out you can still upvote its just this thread not allowing the upvotes / downvotes for some reason

    Edge Of The Forum mazer

  • Marriage news.
    ShadowGamerXundefined ShadowGamerX

    @Jacqueline yeah i was just trying to upvote @ttvsnd325 's post telling me round 12 est for the time its happening and it said that I do not have enough privileges for this action meaning you need a certain rank and above.. I believe its with the reputation stuff idk

    Edge Of The Forum mazer

  • Marriage news.
    ShadowGamerXundefined ShadowGamerX

    @Jacqueline ur fine dwbi I'm just now noticing that you need a certain rank lvl thing to upvote now.. that sucks :( anyways I'm used to weird stuff so yeah plus ik it wouldn't be ur fault.

    Edge Of The Forum mazer

Member List

Andyboiundefined Andyboi
lil_n00bundefined lil_n00b
Innocentundefined Innocent
AstridIsAPuppyundefined AstridIsAPuppy
Laralis_014undefined Laralis_014
angelemi2014undefined angelemi2014
ttvsnd325undefined ttvsnd325
GR1MR34P3R877undefined GR1MR34P3R877
EminemMusicundefined EminemMusic
jummbox8undefined jummbox8
graycieundefined graycie
itzmejummboz8undefined itzmejummboz8
Gamizavierundefined Gamizavier
amenundefined amen
xenthundefined xenth
moonundefined moon
Scrooge' McDuckundefined Scrooge' McDuck
Addyundefined Addy
tntundefined tnt
Echo_isnt_hereundefined Echo_isnt_here
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Groups
  • Users
  • Tags
  • Popular