Yet Another Rule Update

[UnpaidIntern]

@TwoTimee you should still 100% rename it for yourself so nobody looks up "spawnism" and gets like all of that

[TwoTimee]

@UnpaidIntern the point is sooo they find the group?

i forgot abt tags :-:

[UnpaidIntern]

@TwoTimee you can also just make it a group that redirects to something like "pointism" or some other renamed branch, just naming it "spawnism" isn't a good idea

[TwoTimee]

@UnpaidIntern why would i rename it though????

oh no i get hate isnt a good reason o.o

[UnpaidIntern]

@TwoTimee hate isn't the reason, naming it "spawnism" inherently encourages people to seek out spawnist places like the creepy discord servers that you mentioned

[TwoTimee]

@UnpaidIntern ok.. that is there choice. i can add a warning if that helps???

[UnpaidIntern]

@TwoTimee that's like promoting Christianity then warning to never go to any churches

[TwoTimee]

@UnpaidIntern ok?? imo this may be a hot take:

if they are apart of spawnism they probably know of the bad servers... it kinda comes with the package if your vocal abt it 0.o

i lowkey dunno what to say anymore. talking/typeing is hard

[TwoTimee]

anyway i suggest we drop this topic or you can yap to me in dms. your choice

[UnpaidIntern]

@TwoTimee ok, it's just that renaming is like super easy and would basically solve quite literally every single problem about it (irl religions did that all of the time in history) AND make this rule basically not apply anymore, but i'll just drop it ig

although those weird servers also should not come with the package anyway, especially if you encourage even opening that package (which greatly endangers literally anyone who does), you actually have the option to just rename it and just not deal with any of that mess or have others also end up dealing with that mess