-
@Melancholyyuga said in We must secure a homeland for our people & a future for Human children:
I shouldn't be called robophobic (i'm not scared of them) for not wanting to date a robo-girl. I want to date a REAL girl, not some copycat that will NEVER be human. It's called having preferences.
the talki AI people get out there torches and pitchforks to kill this man :skull:
@Yanderemenhera WHAT :sob:
-
I shouldn't be called robophobic (i'm not scared of them) for not wanting to date a robo-girl. I want to date a REAL girl, not some copycat that will NEVER be human. It's called having preferences.
@Melancholyyuga holy shit this is WAY too close to actual discrimination :sob:
-
@Melancholyyuga holy shit this is WAY too close to actual discrimination :sob:
@maple What I've been trying to point out lol
-
tbh, i just don't agree with giving our jobs and such to AI, i believe the AI takeover will be slow and submissive, born from human laziness and corporate greed.
-
we can have AI, but when AI runs everything and has the ability to have rights such as citizenship is when we need to back up and become self aware b4 they do.
-
i personally would not trust AI in the medical feeld. i Wouldn't want an AI reviewing my scan on my brain i had in the ER. AI doesn't belong in places where error can kill such as that or in cars or incharge of the government.
-
AI should be used to ASSIST rather than run
-
i personally would not trust AI in the medical feeld. i Wouldn't want an AI reviewing my scan on my brain i had in the ER. AI doesn't belong in places where error can kill such as that or in cars or incharge of the government.
@Yanderemenhera I heavily disagree with this, AI can fix problems humans cannot in the medical field, and that is one of the main uses it SHOULD have in my opinion, but it also shouldn't be forced until proven effective. People should have the right to only stick to the current standard rather than forcing a person to depend on a machine
-
i do not trust it, especially when a human life is at stake and someone dies, who do we hold accoutable?
-
plus who here has heard of "i have no mouth and i must scream"?
wilford bremly, sep, 27th 1934 to Aug, 1st, 2020
hit me up on discord, my username is wilfordbremly and I will talk to you 'bout daibetus
my new grounds account is called phroggered
look at dat to see ''exclusive'' content or whatever. -
i do not trust it, especially when a human life is at stake and someone dies, who do we hold accoutable?
@Yanderemenhera That's why it should be optional, for accountability
-
And AI I feel has the potential to have a higher chance of saving human lives than humans do-
-
i think ai excels at pattern recognition and tedious tasks (in fact - thats what ai is!! its a large language model, it compares the user input to patterns in it's very large database, very tedious for humans but perfect at patterns). like the brain scan example - doctors might be inspecting scans for a long time and gets tired, plus human pattern recognition is very fallible. so tasking an ai to do it and then verifying it with humans is a perfect setup.
-
plus who here has heard of "i have no mouth and i must scream"?
@Yanderemenhera 😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳😳 me ahhh ahhh ahhhhh
-
i think ai excels at pattern recognition and tedious tasks (in fact - thats what ai is!! its a large language model, it compares the user input to patterns in it's very large database, very tedious for humans but perfect at patterns). like the brain scan example - doctors might be inspecting scans for a long time and gets tired, plus human pattern recognition is very fallible. so tasking an ai to do it and then verifying it with humans is a perfect setup.
@maple jobs bro jobs
-
undefined Raven moved this topic from Edge Of The Forum on
-
undefined Raven moved this topic from Edge Of The Forum on
-
undefined Raven moved this topic from Edge Of The Forum on
