why was this rejected.

[Almond]

It is NOT just raven apart of the moderation team!! Ironically enough it is me in charge of moderation matters. Raven is right, this was not a post for him to be tagged in. Our mods reject posts by using their best interest, if they believe a post will cause trouble, obviously they'd rather delete it. If you don't like how we run things here, your more than welcome to leave. I'd like to acknowledge how much Ravens done for us moderation wise, and you'd be in a worse community without him. You're entitled to have an opinion, but at least understand who you should be directing your frustration at before clicking that post button!

[ThatisRico]

My apologies to Raven plus anyone for wrong approach to you. Everyone on BDNS whom are new on this site been frustrating, not active on here. Including myself. Hmm, Again, I am very sorry about it.

[ThatisRico]

Probably that I just step out and not active on BDNS. It been difficult decision. Sighing. Take Care, Everyone!

[Kam]

Yes, this wasn't to judge raven. my bad. This post was more to address the problems I have seen, and I'm sorry if I made it appear as though I was being a hypocrite.

[shrub]

ts so tuff yall

[Faust]

mango

[Kam]

stop thread derailing on a complaint post please

[BritishUnity]

@Eggyz999 Yes, you are right, but we also need to use common sense. Drama is not a technical rule violation. If we accept a post that appears to be going to cause drama, whether it is meaningful or not, it will only lead to people getting into trouble and being banned or muted. By not excepting every post that doesn't technically violate the rules, we are attempting to prevent people from being muted every other day, which would only drive them away as we work to improve our reputation. We're attempting to prevent that, and just because someone posts something doesn't guarantee that it will start a dispute, what matters is how others react to it. That causes the problem, which is why things like discussions about politics and other topics are prohibited. Although discussing them isn't inherently harmful, we are all aware that it will be completely overblown because we have witnessed it. Thus, some things need to be restricted. Common sense is another element of the site rules. This holds true for both site users and moderators, without common sense, there would be no order. Besides, we train each moderator until they are up to par, and while we are rapidly accepting new members, we are working on providing them with accurate and effective training. Some of them might still be rejected, they are essentially still in the trial phase. I am aware of your worries. I'm not sure which of your posts was rejected, It shouldn't have been unless it used a lot of profanity or if any other rule was broken. Depending on how serious it is, a legitimate BrowseDNS complaint regardless of its confrontational nature should either be approved or rejected and discussed in private if it is great enough. We are currently working on training all of the moderators correctly, and I apologize that your post was rejected. I believe Wolfie and a few others are currently working on training a few. (This post is not specifically directed at you; it is intended for everyone who has concerns.) I assume your post is as well.

[Kam]

@BritishUnity bluddy I know your ass did NOT write all that without a thesaurus or AI, I just know you Thank you for the response though but you a lil late lmao.

@BritishUnity said in why was this rejected.:

BrowseDNS complaint regardless of its confrontational nature should either be approved or rejected and discussed in private if it is great enough.

ALSO, in the past I have talked to raven about issues such as this and got told this statement wasn't true? Like I got told if I had an issue with a moderator or a user i'm supposed to make a public complaint rather than a private one to, "Keep it transparent," if I remember his exact words correctly. Sorry for correcting you, I just want you to have your facts straight so there's no confusion :)

[Biblecampvictim]

@BritishUnity Chatgtp carried ts

[Biblecampvictim]

@BritishUnity Chatgtp carried ts

[Biblecampvictim]

@BritishUnity Chatgtp carried ts

[Andyboi]

chatgpt carried this (original comment by @BIBLECAMPVICTIM)

[Biblecampvictim]

@TheAndyboi w

[Biblecampvictim]

@TheAndyboi w

[Biblecampvictim]

bdns is so broken

[BritishUnity]

@Eggyz999 I did write it all I did use some words off of Google cause I kept getting to a point where I didn't know what word goes there plus I love debating I was on a debate team for awhile and you are right about the moderator or user that's why I said extreme cases like rpe or Murer etc which is why I said extreme cases lol

[BritishUnity]

@BIBLECAMPVICTIM ask Eggy I hate chatGPT I did search up some of the words when I got stuck tho

[Aries]

Mods do have a handbook but it's not been sent much apparently, You say kids can't do stuff but how do you really expect them to learn? Raven himself started at 13. I only started like a few months ago but I came to grips with it quite quickly due to training and experience. Although I think they should try train newer mods more you do also have to remember that bdns was understaffed and hiring new mods was needed. Please be patient with them, maybe try dming someone first about this, like almond or literally any of the globals before making a post like this, all it does is add more stress to the newer mods who are still getting used to this and have literally only been doing this for at most, a week. In my opinion they seem to be doing fine so far :3

[Kam]

@BritishUnity BRO "I hate chatgpt"
-Brayden, never.

BRO YOU HAVE C.AI AND POLYAI ON YOUR PHONE THAT THE SAME DAMN THING BOY

generative ais are bad no matter what the "purpose" of it is, I genuinely have never heard u say you hated AI