-
who does?
-
this post concerns me.
-
who does?
@Kaedan-Epik this concerns me, i agree with sam
-
This post is deleted!
-
who does?
@Kaedan-Epik This concerns me, I am with Dawnthedemon
-
i am concerned this concerns people, i am with everyone else
-
Why are you asking for people's social security. Of course no one is dumb enough to give their social security to you. Just tell me. Why do you want personal info like that. Do you hope to gain something from it
-
im not asking for peoples social security number, its just social secuirty #1 which im pretth sure,no one has
-
im not asking for peoples social security number, its just social secuirty #1 which im pretth sure,no one has
@Kaedan-Epik I don't think there's a "#1" to social security
It's a mash of numbers for a reason -
oh
-
im locking this post. @Jared , should we give this guy a warning or just a little nudge?
-
System locked this topic on
-
I don't see a problem with it, He was just asking if anyone the Social Security #1. I will stay out of this but this is my opinion to this matter.
-
im locking this post. @Jared , should we give this guy a warning or just a little nudge?
@sam-the-man Kaedan has been quite the issue recently, it would be good to warn imo
-
im locking this post. @Jared , should we give this guy a warning or just a little nudge?
@sam-the-man give them a warning
-
Welp I looked into this:
Fay of the Social Security Administration selected a record from the top of the first stack of 1,000 records and announced that the first Social Security number in history was assigned to John David Sweeney, Jr. of New Rochelle, New York. However, since the Social Security numbers were not assigned in chronological order, Sweeney did not receive the lowest Social Security number, 001-01-0001. That distinction belongs to Grace D. Owen of Concord, New Hampshire.
-
undefined Raven moved this topic from Hangout on
-
undefined Raven moved this topic from Edge Of The Forum on
