New Rule!

[Ameris_Blizz]

@Maditalian No no, I understand those. I'm kind of referring to the fact that maybe at some point the new rules will be just about the smallest things

[Raven]

All of our new rules are discussed with the team and are based off of incidents that have happened on the site. Looks to me like youre saying we're making new rules for the "smallest things". If you agree with the new rules then what does that mean?

To be clear, based off of 3 reasonable rules that you personally have agreed to you are saying that in the future we are going to make unreasonable rules? I do not follow

[Ameris_Blizz]

Well, that depends on the point of view. again, I'm not saying rules are bad, they're there to help the site. and I respect that. but what I mean by smallest things is stuff that people don't really do.- but again, I'm not one to judge. I didn't mean to say it in a wrong way.- I apologize

[Ameris_Blizz]

I'm not really making sense right now.-

[Almond]

@Ameris_Blizz excuse me for bumping in but you did say that the rules have gotten bizarre, meaning that you do have a problem of some sorts with our rules.

[Ameris_Blizz]

@Almond All good, and yeah, you're right but like I said. that depends on the point of view. but hey, if it's helping the site I won't judge any further.

[Ameris_Blizz]

@Nared Idek what that means either

[Almond]

@Ameris_Blizz The way you stated your claim made it appear that it was based off of your point of view and feelings. Realize that we only put out these rules because we are given reasons to.

[Nared]

@Ameris_Blizz from what I am understanding. You say that mass advertising is a small thing. You do realize if we didn't do something about it. It would of gotten worse. I put that rule in place for the people who do. If we just turnt a blind eye. Nothing would get solved, they would continuously post on the site until the site is filled with the spammers. Not being mean. Just telling the truth

[Yanderemenhera]

i think the new rules make sense, i think it's ok, i honestly just wish the rule about illegal activity and weapons made it clear that talking about video games was ok bc i was confused and was worried about joining the murder mistery event

[Raven]

I already said video games were fine, that's just common sense. We have categories for games with guns. Smfh

[Yuni]

Ngl, i thought this was a rule, tbh i keep forgetting the rules..
BREKING EVRY RUL CHALLENJ WITH MAI BISTI @Sup3rswaggyy1983 END @Apollo.is.silly VERI REL!!! CUPS CULLED!!! AYT ALL MUDS!!!!!
/j ofc

[A Former User]

@Yuni-Just-weird Where Is Apollo Then????

[A Former User]

This post is deleted!

[Bingus.4]

@KG3M0 said in New Rule!:

@Yuni-Just-weird Where Is Apollo Then????

been wondering that since i got back T^T

[Apollo.Is.Silly]

Alright

[Eggyz999]

@Maditalian LMAO WHAT. WHAT HAPPENED WHILE I WAS ON HIATUS

[YourAriesBestie]

@Eggyz999 Nothing, its just a new rule. No need to overreact..

[Wolfinator734]

many people might be disagreeing like "sexual references are already banned!! we don't need this rule cuz its already there" but the thing is, people use these shortened terms as a way to make sure it's only recognized by the group that understands it, and if you see someones bio saying "im fr 100% a bottom and nobodys gonna change it" people are gonna get curious, especially MINORS. because they bring so much attention to it. even though it is classified as a "sexual reference" it still deserves it's own rule

[Eggyz999]

@Wolfinator734 me getting cancelled on minor bdns for sayin, "hawk tuah'' :'(

(pls get the reference)