New Rule!

Raven

Okay so to be clear, BDSM is inappropriate, sexual and probably prohibited on every 13+ website. It technically falls under being inappropriate, but i think it is better to be clear.

and Nareds new rule is 100% reasonable. We were spammed by over 10 bots while you were offline.

and my recent rule saying not to mentioning drugs, weapons or anything of that nature is just... something you wouldn't want on a 13+ website.

All three new rules are in place to create a safe atmosphere, and if you're trying to justify that they're not needed then I find that ridiculous. The @administrators already know they can come to me if they do not agree with any of our rules.

Anything else that you are concerned about?

Ameris_Blizz

@Maditalian No no, I understand those. I'm kind of referring to the fact that maybe at some point the new rules will be just about the smallest things

Raven

All of our new rules are discussed with the team and are based off of incidents that have happened on the site. Looks to me like youre saying we're making new rules for the "smallest things". If you agree with the new rules then what does that mean?

To be clear, based off of 3 reasonable rules that you personally have agreed to you are saying that in the future we are going to make unreasonable rules? I do not follow

Ameris_Blizz

Well, that depends on the point of view. again, I'm not saying rules are bad, they're there to help the site. and I respect that. but what I mean by smallest things is stuff that people don't really do.- but again, I'm not one to judge. I didn't mean to say it in a wrong way.- I apologize

Ameris_Blizz

I'm not really making sense right now.-

Almond

@Ameris_Blizz excuse me for bumping in but you did say that the rules have gotten bizarre, meaning that you do have a problem of some sorts with our rules.

Ameris_Blizz

@Almond All good, and yeah, you're right but like I said. that depends on the point of view. but hey, if it's helping the site I won't judge any further.

Ameris_Blizz

@Nared Idek what that means either

Almond

@Ameris_Blizz The way you stated your claim made it appear that it was based off of your point of view and feelings. Realize that we only put out these rules because we are given reasons to.

Nared

@Ameris_Blizz from what I am understanding. You say that mass advertising is a small thing. You do realize if we didn't do something about it. It would of gotten worse. I put that rule in place for the people who do. If we just turnt a blind eye. Nothing would get solved, they would continuously post on the site until the site is filled with the spammers. Not being mean. Just telling the truth

Yanderemenhera

i think the new rules make sense, i think it's ok, i honestly just wish the rule about illegal activity and weapons made it clear that talking about video games was ok bc i was confused and was worried about joining the murder mistery event

Raven

I already said video games were fine, that's just common sense. We have categories for games with guns. Smfh

Yuni

Ngl, i thought this was a rule, tbh i keep forgetting the rules..
BREKING EVRY RUL CHALLENJ WITH MAI BISTI @Sup3rswaggyy1983 END @Apollo.is.silly VERI REL!!! CUPS CULLED!!! AYT ALL MUDS!!!!!
/j ofc

? Offline

@Yuni-Just-weird Where Is Apollo Then????

? Offline

This post is deleted!

Bingus.4

@KG3M0 said in New Rule!:

@Yuni-Just-weird Where Is Apollo Then????

been wondering that since i got back T^T

Apollo.Is.Silly

Alright

Kam

@Maditalian LMAO WHAT. WHAT HAPPENED WHILE I WAS ON HIATUS

? Offline

@Eggyz999 Nothing, its just a new rule. No need to overreact..

Wolfinator734

many people might be disagreeing like "sexual references are already banned!! we don't need this rule cuz its already there" but the thing is, people use these shortened terms as a way to make sure it's only recognized by the group that understands it, and if you see someones bio saying "im fr 100% a bottom and nobodys gonna change it" people are gonna get curious, especially MINORS. because they bring so much attention to it. even though it is classified as a "sexual reference" it still deserves it's own rule