Who wins? 1,000 woman? or 500 men?
-
Stupid group •Cat Gang• Anti Cringe My twins ''she's 17 scott'' chat-perms Curly fries Tamagotchi club! Melt Ice Belt to ass short person purple gang Survived a near death experience (yay) Autistic peeps deltarune DOOM FAN cool ppl!😎 #wowie4life oh my wowie wowzers landd :6 WAAPPLLAPF HATER We <3 Gir Switchbru TF2 Fan! Straight selling emojs Believers of Almond SHAW!!!! mazer friendz :3 yoylefriend Johnny.SS Glazer w spamburger | twotime fan INVADER ZIM - The Takeover xbox nostalgia Good Riddance </3 Damn is 😂🎉 999 Тотя hate club ANTI-67 Anti-Clanker ENA FAN Single 420 certified crackhead neurodivergent Don toliver Westhelm Court Westhelm military Westhelm w chill people 9 mazurka kids Bendy <DOODLE DUMP!> 3DS Users & 2DS Users ★1NT3RN3T K1DZ★ WARNING! STUPID! straight allies! @Everyone i love cats Eeveelution Fan! `Gravity Falls` gleeby glorp indie game fan Silliest Goobers
depends
-
If they're average women vs average men I think it depends largely on how the battle is set up, if the men are in a good position, I think an average male COULD take 2 average females, but if the women form clusters and play on number advantage and the men can't handle it quickly enough or most aren't able to enter the fight easily, that's probably game. This is strictly if everyone is average though, if we have a bunch of varying people, it depends on the people more than the position or battle formation.
-
Hi pal My answer is..... Men
-
This post is deleted!
-
I think you need more specifications. How is each person built? How does everyone on either side collaborate with each other? Are there any weapons involved, or is it purely a battle of strength? How is everyone positioned? I'd probably say women here without extra context, assuming everyone is of average strength and it's not a fight with weapons, purely because there are a LOT more of them and they could easily take down the men. If it were 500 women vs 500 men, again without a lot of context and just assuming, I'd likely say the men in that case because the overall average strength for males tends to be higher than that of the average strength for females.
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
What about 2000 non-binarys
-
Men, and here's why:
Men are strong on their own, they're especially dangerous before their frontal lobes completely develope, as a boy, I can confirm that we (men) push our selves for no reason at all, like for fun, as a result, we'd likely push through wounds, though we'd succumb to a surplus of injures as a result.
-
@Royal-order I’m not a girl


-
@FLEX bro's like the most masculine person on the dns.
۫