Modern-Day Satanism and TST #2

KiwiFarmsArkavel

@Ren said in Modern-Day Satanism and TST:

"you missed one" ahh

sc4retic

@Idyll I totally agree, how tf is it controversial? Besides, as I said, why do we let christian posts slide but not this?

KiwiFarmsArkavel

@st4tic said in Modern-Day Satanism and TST:

@Idyll I totally agree, how tf is it controversial? Besides, as I said, why do we let christian posts slide but not this?

uh oh, I smell bias

BritishUnity

@st4tic He didn't say that? All of JesusLovesYou posts mostly are still up which is why JesusLovesYou depending on the scenario has been talked to privately. Also you lirerally said it yourself his posts are up and this guys post is up he's remined jesuslovesyou on this same issue in the past. While it is technically not allowed were not the most strict on it. Which we probably should be eventually but it's not hurting anyone that much. JesusLovesYou isn't neccasrily forcing anything on anyone which is probably why it's stayed up no one at least no one that's came out is uncomfortable like that christians and not christians besides one person awhile back but they had a argument. To some this post does make them feel uncomfortable which can lead to heavy controversy if they ever act on it. I doubt they will but that chances however we do need to step up our game in following the rule but it's not the biggest of rule breaks. Considering it's pretty calm here. Raven probably only sent that to let him know. Now it might get taken down if Raven decides it cause everyone here is going at him That's on him though interesting post though! I liked it :3 (Just my opinion if I carried this info wrong any mod feel free to correct me)

KiwiFarmsArkavel

"neccasrily"

BritishUnity

oh also Jesuslovesyou has had multiple locked posts on christianity we4 haven't taken them down cause they're not bad but he has recieved warning this post isn't even locked you can't compare both of them when one's recieved multiple warning for this type of thing one hasn't lol

sc4retic

dawg, i'm not even satanist, i'm literally an atheist for [censored]'s sake. but like, all i'm saying is that it's lowkenuinely kinda unfair for raven to hint at it being controversial when there's nothing wrong with it :P

KiwiFarmsArkavel

@st4tic said in Modern-Day Satanism and TST:

dawg, i'm not even satanist, i'm literally an atheist for [censored]'s sake. but like, all i'm saying is that it's lowkenuinely kinda unfair for raven to hint at it being controversial when there's nothing wrong with it :P

(I meant I can smell raven's bias /hj)

sc4retic

Ohhhhhh that makes sense XD

BritishUnity

This post is deleted!

BritishUnity

Ooop- my fault if u read that

sc4retic

LMAO- I read that

but yh, let's just forget ts, we're derailing the topic

BritishUnity

@st4tic yeah I was going to mention that if it kept going

w1ckedsticky1983

Can we just stop derailing ts bro why can't we just respect other people's religions

Edit: uhmmmm posted this a lil late, but my point still stands-

Raven

This would generally be considered a controversial topic.

Modern-day Satanism, especially organizations like The Satanic Temple, falls under religion and social/political ideology, which are inherently sensitive discussion areas.

I wasn't necessarily saying it wasn't allowed. However, if we wanted to, it could technically fall under the religious talks rule. Most of JesusLovesYou's posts are warmhearted and aren't necessarily looking for discussion, while this thread here seems rather discussion-based.

Astra-chan

Based

MahiMahi

I heavily agree with static, i dont see how this topic was controversial, we should be allowed to share and talk about our own religion freely, there should be nothing controversial because their should be mutual respect for others beliefs, you dont believe or support it? Ok good for you but don’t criticize or demote others because of there beliefs

Plus4+

@Raven
Why does Jesuslovesyou get a pass? How is christianity not a social ideology? It's embarrassing to see rules enforced, or threatened to be enforced, so obscurely. It really is. If religious talks are against forum rules you shouldn't have let anyone do it from the start instead of letting your bias cloud your decisions.
I highly doubt that all the non-christians on this site see Jesuslovesyou's posts as heartwarming.
I'm not being hostile in this post, I'm not trying to force myself on anyone else, I'm just sharing my religion in an honest and civil way.

YOU'RE the one making this topic controversial.

?

@Raven Honestly I feel like that rule needs changed- I was gonna ask about it, people should be allowed to at least DISCUSS controversial topics, so long as nobody is fighting and it's all debate, isn't that what we want? People to disagree and discuss topics? We shouldn't allow fighting, if things get heated and become less intellectual and more personal, then yeah, cut it, but banning discussion/debate defeats the purpose of a forum. Forums are made to discuss and share interests and information right?

sc4retic

I totally agree TwT This is a forum after all???