Who wins? 1,000 woman? or 500 men?

[Aries]

uhh, probably say it depends on wether the women are all really strong, mixed ability or weaker. Likewise for men

[A Former User]

this topic is dumb....why did i make this

[Biblecampvictim]

500 men easily

[BoredRat]

the gorilla

[FLEX]

me ......... duh

[mazernade]

500 men

[Rusty]

@LEVINA Men. This isn't sexist or anything, men are just physically stronger.

[_Izzy_]

women for sure, theyre better at collaborating and im pretty sure (could be wrong) have greater endurance

while men are typically stronger then the average women, i feel like ppl underestimate how powerful a large group of women could truly be, also ive personally observed that atleast where i live most women are kinda smarter then guys but this is just where i live lol

also random but i just found out today that the idea of men being hunters and women gatherers is rlly misleading bc a little less then half of remains found by scientist imply that women were also hunting prey along with men, and that for 95% of human history up until 13,000 years ago, women and men were considered equal in their groups and the whole patriarchy and men being 'alphas' or 'dominant' is actually rlly recent and happened during the agricultural revolution when humans stared settling in one spot:P

[ev.sebastian]

Women. 1 man to 2 women. People get really strong when they are trying to end a life, and one adrenaline fueled man can't take 2 adrenaline fueled women. If everyone's at the same skill level, assuming you don't percieve women as weaker, it's still women due to sheer numbers. If it were, say, 500 v 500, it would be men due to genetic predisposition, but it's not. So yur, women.

[_Izzy_]

@ev.sebastian i actually think 1 guy can takeon 2 women, but if the women pick off men individually by working together in groups of like 20, i think theyll win
i feel like the men wouldnt be able to collab as well in time and lose, i also think theyd underestimate the women aswell which could be fatal

[ev.sebastian]

@_Izzy_ well my picture of this is a straight on like horde battle in an empty field, but if it's just like they're all placed in a forest and whenever one faction is dead the other wins, then strategy could play a part

[Yanderemenhera]

@_Izzy_ depends on the woman, i'm 5'9 and my bf is 5'4. he is NOT taking me down I think if they had weapons or were physically larger he'd be cooked. I honestly think it varies and it really depends on the lady's and the dude

[stupidguy]

depends

[A Former User]

If they're average women vs average men I think it depends largely on how the battle is set up, if the men are in a good position, I think an average male COULD take 2 average females, but if the women form clusters and play on number advantage and the men can't handle it quickly enough or most aren't able to enter the fight easily, that's probably game. This is strictly if everyone is average though, if we have a bunch of varying people, it depends on the people more than the position or battle formation.

[Silas Silver]

Hi pal My answer is..... Men

[Rorschach]

This post is deleted!

[tyler_x]

I think you need more specifications. How is each person built? How does everyone on either side collaborate with each other? Are there any weapons involved, or is it purely a battle of strength? How is everyone positioned? I'd probably say women here without extra context, assuming everyone is of average strength and it's not a fight with weapons, purely because there are a LOT more of them and they could easily take down the men. If it were 500 women vs 500 men, again without a lot of context and just assuming, I'd likely say the men in that case because the overall average strength for males tends to be higher than that of the average strength for females.

[Rorschach]

This post is deleted!

[Rorschach]

This post is deleted!

[Ang3l]

What about 2000 non-binarys